Emergence in Organizations
Emergence became thought of as one of the defining properties of complex systems and over the last twenty years there has been a wide-ranging debate about its nature and causes. However, although emergence may be a defining property of complex systems but it is itself far from easy to define. A more easier(rather complicated) definition is
Emergence is the production of global patterns of behaviour by agents in a complex system interacting according to their own local rules of behaviour, without intending the global patterns of behaviour that come about. In emergence, global patterns cannot be predicted from the local rules of behaviour that produce them. To put it another way, global patterns cannot be reduced to individual behaviour. (Stacey 1996:287)
Designing for Emergence in Organizations is still in its infancy with traditional command and control paradigm widely adopted. Here is a list showing differences between command and control paradigm and emergent paradigm
Command & control paradigm | Emergent paradigm |
Keep people in ‘silos’ | Build connectivity |
Ensure everyone ‘salutes the flag’ | Encourage diversity |
Manage communication initiatives | Have conversations in corridors |
Blame people for failures | Learn from events |
Make it clear who’s in charge | Give everyone leadership opportunities |
Tell people what to do | Tell people what not to do |
Set objectives | Agree clear goals |
Keep busy | Wait expectantly |
Reference
1. "Emergence in Organizations" by Richard Seel
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home